Judicial activism entails an active role of the judiciary in shaping public policy through its interpretations of constitutional law. This approach can lead to significant political implications, such as the protection of individual rights and liberties against majority rule. Judicial activism often challenges existing legal precedents, prompting lawmakers to reconsider legislation in light of new interpretations. However, it can also provoke controversy and accusations of overreach, as some argue it undermines democratic processes by allowing unelected judges to dictate policy. The balance of power between branches of government becomes a key concern in this context.