Arguments for campaign spending limits often focus on promoting equality in elections by curtailing the influence of wealth and special interests on political outcomes. Proponents argue that lower spending can level the playing field, enabling candidates with grassroots support to compete effectively. Conversely, opponents contend that such limits infringe upon the freedom of speech, as financial contributions are viewed as a form of political expression. Additionally, they argue that limiting funds might hinder democratic discourse by restricting candidates’ ability to communicate their messages widely. The debate over campaign spending continues to evoke strong opinions on both sides.